Gerakan Ateis dalam Kerangka Tafsiran Perkara 11 (4) Perlembagaan Persekutuan
Keywords:
Ab initio, Atheist, Communist, Memorandum Majlis Raja-Raja, Article 11 (4)Abstract
All religions predominantly Islam believe and assure that nature does not happen by itself. However, Atheists have the opposite perspective. In essence, Atheists repudiate the existence of the Creator of nature. These movements are getting more enthusiastic spreading their doctrines in the new media. Inhibitory measures were taken with the proposal to impose restrictions through provisions in Article 11 (4) of the Federal Constitution, The Sedition Act 1948 and violations of the principles of Rukun Negara. Some explicate that Article 11 (4), allows them to be non-religious. Thus, this article intends to evaluate the interpretation of Article 11 (4) based on the secondary literatures according to the framework of a qualitative study. The data collected will then be analyzed by content analysis. The findings of the study found out that, there was no clear interpretation of the Atheist movement. However, the literature shows that the existence of Article 11 (4) is based on the elicit of the Council Of Rulers over the memorandum to the Reid Commission which demanded a special provision which can protect the Malays from being converted and influenced by the ideology of communism. Communists and Atheists have the same characteristics and Article 11 (4) should also apply to Atheists. The whole article concludes that there is a lacuna of interpretation to the provisions of Article 11 (4) of the Federal Constitution at present against the Atheist movement. The findings also shows that there has been no perpetration in any court in Malaysia.
References
Abdul Razak, H. (1971). Ucapan Perhimpunan Pergerakan Kaum Ibu dan Pemuda UMNO. chromeextension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/http://lib.perdana.org.my/P LF/Digitisation_MTAR/MTAR_Speech/old%20document/Ucapan%20TAR%201971/ Ucapan%20PM%20dan%20Yang%20Dipertua%20UMNO%20Malaysia%20di%20Pe rhimpunan%20Pergerakkan%20Kaum%20Ibu%20dan%20Pemuda%20UMNO%20di %20Dewan%20Bahasa%20dan%20Pustaka,%20Kuala%20Lumpur%20pada%2022hb %20Januari,%201971.pdf
Aziz, A. R. (2010). Rukun Negara dalam Memperkukuhkan. Political Managements and Policies in Malaysia (pp. 443-457). Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Allan, T. R. S. (2013). The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law (First edition). Oxford University Press.
Awani. (2017). Ateisme Perlu Dicegah. https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/ateisme perlu-dicegah-dr-shamrahayu-161170
Bairagi, V., & Munot, M. V. (Eds.). (2019). Research methodology: A practical and scientific approach. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. RoutledgeFalmer.
Faisal, S. H. (2015). Perlembagaan Persekutuan: Asas Utama Hubungan Etnik. Wawasan Open Univesiti.
Faisal. (2018). Perbincangan berkaitan Agama dan Ketuhanan dari Facebook "Warung Atheist" dari Perspektif Logik dan Emosi. Journal of Islamic Social Sciences and Humanities .
Finch, E., & Fafinski, S. (2016). English Legal System. Pearson Education Limited. http://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=5137772 Irfan Habibie, M., Husaini, A., & Syafrin, N. (2019). Pengaruh worldview ateis terhadap teori evolusi. Ta’dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 146.
https://doi.org/10.32832/tadibuna.v8i1.1881
Julian Baggini. (2003). Atheism: A very Short Introduction. United States, New York: Oxford University Press.
Karen, A. (1998). A History of God: The 4000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Ballantine.
Kettell, S. (2016). What‟s really new about new atheism? Palgrave Communications.
Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor. (2011). Religious Tolerance in Malaysia: An Overview. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 9(1), 23-27.
Muhammad, A. (2017, November 25). Tangani Ateisme dengan Debat bukan Undang-undang. Retrieved from Malaysia Kini: https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/403330
Muhamad Faisal Ashaari, S. H. (2018). Perbincangan berkaitan Agama dan Ketuhanan dalam Facebook "Warung Atheist"dari Perspektif Logik dan Emosi. Journal of Islamic Social Sciences and Humanities, 65-79.
Malaysiakini. (2017). Peguam: Kebebasan beragama termasuk kebebasan tak beragama. Malaysiakini. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/403253
Mohd Awang, I., Mohd Sobhi, I., Azanin, A., & Aszunarni, A. (2019). Penyelidikan Sains Sosial: Aplikasi Teori dan Metodologi. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Muhamad Faisal, A., & Siti Hanisah, S. (2018). Perbincangan Berkaitan Agama Dan Ketuhanan Dalam Facebook “Warung Atheist” Dari Perspektif Logik Dan Emosi. 15, 16.
Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Dewan Rakyat (Bilangan 53 Parlimen Ketiga Belas Penggal Kelima Mesyuarat Ketiga; Bilangan 53, p. 137). (2017). Dewan Rakyat. chrome extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://parlimen.gchrome extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://parlimen.gov.my/files/hinde x/pdf/DR-23112017.pdf
Rozmi Ismail. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan: Teori dan praktis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Shamrahayu A. Aziz. (2018). Islam dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Penerbit IKIM. Steven, K. (2016). What’s really new about New Atheism? Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 16099. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.99
YADIM, E. (2017, August 9). Bendung ateis sebelum terlambat: Mufti. Yayasan Dakwah Islamiah Malaysia. https://www.yadim.com.my/v2/bendung-ateis-sebelum-terlambat mufti/
Zacharias, R. (2004). The Real Face of Atheism. Baker Books.
https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=5249610 Zul-kifli, H. (2013). Tasamuh Dalam Undang-Undang Jenayah Islam: Satu Kajian Terhadap Persepsi Pelajar-Pelajar Bukan Islam di Institusi-Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam (IPTA) Di Malaysia [Universiti Sains Malaysia]. chrome
extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/http://eprints.usm.my/44038/1/Zul Kifli%20Bin%20Hussin24.pdf
