Affective Domain in Learning Taxonomy at Institution of Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI062022-1Keywords:
Affective Domain, Values education, Holistic human, akhlaq (morals), tasawufAbstract
In the new era of Industrial Revolution 4.0, students must equip themselves holistically with knowledge, values, and skills to be relevant to current job market requirements. This requires students to be empowered in the affective domain to achieve balance with the cognitive and psychomotor domains. Student involvement in substance abuse, as well as an increase in mental health problems including depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts, are among the signs of a void in the affective or psychological aspects. The purpose of the paper is to highlight scholars’ discourse concerning the position of the affective domain and its challenge in integrating it into the learning taxonomy. This study involves utilizing content analysis of library documents. Data were processed using an analytical-synthetic descriptive method followed by deductive and inductive analysis. The results obtained showed that the cognitive domain was more dominant in the learning taxonomy, even though the affective domain has received more discussion. Accordingly, this study recommends conducting further research to incorporate appropriate elements from the existing taxonomy models with the main principle of Islamic education that emphasizes both psychological and spiritual development. Discourse on akhlaq and tasawuf in Muslim society is most noteworthy when it comes to applying the affective domain, allowing for complete conscious awareness of the mind (mindfulness) in human beings. A balance integration of cognitive and affective domains can be achieved to create a holistic human being as outlined in the Malaysiuan National Education Policy. As such, this will indirectly contribute to achieving quality tertiary education to ensure a prosperous society in this Industrial Revolution 4.0 era.
References
Abdullahah, M. H., Sulong, M. A. & Abdul Rahim, M. (2020). Development and Validation of the Music Education Teaching Practice E-Supervision System Using the Google Classroom Application. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(10), 84-101.
Adam Badhrulhisham, Muhammad Hilmi Mat Johar, & Taufiq A. Rashid. (2019). Mendepani Cabaran Revolusi Industri 4.0 Dalam Konteks Mahasiswa:Analisis Menurut Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Ilmi, 9, 90-101.
Adlina Abdul Khalil, Mohd Khairi Othman, & Mohd Kasri Saidon. (2020). Memacu Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0: Penerapan Nilai-nilai Islam dan Inovasi dalam Pengajaran di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. Islāmiyyāt, 42((Khas)), 13–20.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, And Assessing : A Revision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives. Longman.
Azwani Masuwai. (2018). Quality Learning Spaces, Resources, Technologies and Constructive Alignment Element in Teaching and Learning. Sains Humanika, 11(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/ 10.11113/sh.v11n1.1258
Biggs J. Aligning teaching and assessment to curriculum objectives. Imaginative Curriculum Project, LTSN Generic Centre. 2003.
Biggs, J.B. and Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead, UK Open University Press.
Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain.
Colding, Johan (2020): A critical reflection on constructive alignment in theory and practice. Reports on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Report. https://doi.org/10.17045/sthlmuni. 11535786.v1.
Higgins, R., Hogg, P., & Robinson, L. (2017). Constructive alignment of a research-informed teaching activity within an undergraduate diagnostic radiography curriculum: A reflection. Radiography, 23, S30–S36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2016.11.004.
Izabela Savickiene. (2010). Conception of Learning Outcomes in the Bloom’s Taxonomy Affective Domain. Quality of Higher Education, 7(7), 37–59.
Jaiswal, P. (2019). Using Constructive Alignment to Foster Teaching Learning Processes. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 10. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p10.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Blooms Taxonomy : An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Lynch, D. R., Russell, J. S., Evans, J. C., & Sutterer, K. G. (2009). Beyond the cognitive: The affective domain, values, and the achievement of the vision. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:1(47).
Mahfuzah M.Z., Asmaa M.A., Norakmal A.H., Mohd H.A.W. & Siti K. M. 2020. The Lecturers’ belief on ethics and Professional Moral Values in Teaching Practices. Asian Journal of University Education. 16(2):77 – 83.
Mahiswaran Selvanathan, Nur Atikah Mohamed Hussin & Noor Alyani Nor Azazi. (2020). Students’ learning experiences during Covid 19: Work From Home Perios in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions. Teaching Public Administration: 1- 10.
Masrom, N. W., Hashim, M., Hashim, N., & Behak, F. P. (2018). Kedudukan Taksonomi Bloom Menurut Perspektif Islam. Journal of Quran Sunnah Education & Special Needs, 2(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.33102/jqss.vol2no1.8.
Mohd Kamal Hassan. (2018). The Necessity of Understanding the Cosmos, Nature and Man, as Well as the Unity of Knowledge, Faith and Ethics from the Worldview of the Qur’an: Implications on an International Islamic University. Revelation and Science, 82 , 1–12.
Mohd Nazir Md. Zabit, Zubeidah Zachariah, T., Abdullah, N., Mohamed Noh, N., Hasnida Che Md Ghazali, N., & Ahmad, H. (2020). The Development and Validation of an Integrated Learning Method Based on Problem-Based Learning in a Pedagogy, Technology and Assessment Course at Malaysia Public Universities. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 10(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2020.102.142.150.
Muhamad Afzamiman Aripin, , R. Hamzah, P. Setya, M. H. M. Hisham, M. I. Mohd Ishar. 2020. Unveiling a new taxonomy in education field. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 9(3): 524-530.
Mustafa, Z., & Yakob, N. (2019). Exploring the Taxonomy Phases of Malik Badri’s Thinking Process among Students Enrolled in Tauhidic Science Education for Biology Subject. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4 (33), 01- 12.
Nelson, J., Pender, D. A., Myers, C. E., & Sheperis, D. (2020). The Effect of Affect: Krathwohl and Bloom’s Affective Domains Underutilized in Counselor Education. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 13(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.7729/131.1279.
Noor Azizah Noorashid. (2019). Revolusi Industri 4.0: Impak terhadap Perkembangan Pendidikan Tinggi di Malaysia. Journal of Science and Management Research, 55–67.
Noradilah Ab Wahab, Muhammad, N., & Ismail, M. S. (2020). Analisis Keberkesanan Penggunaan Ict Dalam Mendepani Gelombang Revolusi Industri 4.0 Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Di Negeri Terengganu, Malaysia. Asian People Journal (APJ), 3(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj. 2020.3.1.149.
Norhazizi Lebai Long, & Ramlee Mustapha. (2019). Analisis Taksonomi Bloom dalam penilaian vokasional: pembangunan suatu Taksonomi baharu menggunakan Teknik Delphi. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 15(1), 65–75.
Omar J. Mohamed, Zakir, N. A., & Alshaikhdeeb, B. (2019). A combination method of syntactic and semantic approaches for classifying examination questions into bloom’s taxonomy cognitive. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14(2), 935–950.
Ramlee Mustapha, Lambin, R., Long, N. L., & Yasin, A. A. (2020). The Need for Vocational Taxonomy for Vocational Teachers and Practitioners : An Initial Analysis. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(3), 783–800.
Regina Lambin, Ramlee Mustapha, Long, N. L., & Mohd Penislin Md Sharif. (2020). The development vocational well-being taxonomy for social and economic sustainability of the nation: A review. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 7157–7170. https://doi.org/ 10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260720.
Seemiller, C., & Whitney, R. (2019). Creating a Taxonomy of Leadership Competency Development. Journal of Leadership Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.12806/v19/i1/r5.
Taber, K. S. (2015). Affect and meeting the needs of the gifted chemistry learner: Providing intellectual challenge to engage students in enjoyable learning. In Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education (pp. 133-158). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Tajudin. N.M, N. A. Rahman, A. Masuwai, N. Idris, (2014). Comparison between Teaching Practices Based on Teacher Educators’ Perception and Learning Experiences Based on Student Teachers’ Perception at Higher Education Institution. Research Journal in Organizational Psychology and Educational Studies (RJOPES), 3(6), 437-445.
Wan Mohd Nor Wan Daud. 2019. Budaya Ilmu Makna dan Manifestasi dalam Sejarah dan Masa Kini. Kuala Lumpur. CASIS & HAKIM .
Yulia Timakova, & Kin Abass Bakon. (2018). Bloom’S Taxonomy-Based Examination Question Paper Generation System. International Journal of Information System and Engineering, 6(2), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.24924/ijise/2018.11/v6.iss2/76.92.
Zafir Khan Mohamed Makhbul, & Mohd Nazmy Abd LAtif. (2019). Mengurus Modal Insan Dalam Industri 4.0 Ke Arah Kecemerlangan Negara. Mengurus Modal Insan Dalam Industri 4.0 Ke Arah Kecemerlangan Negara, 16(6), 1–13.
GJAT provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
