Sulh: A Shariah-Compliant Dispute Avoidance Practice for the Construction Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI062022-4Keywords:
Sulh, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Dispute Avoidance, ConstructionAbstract
Shariah is not just an Islamic law but also a moral code to guide man in enjoining good and abstaining from evil, which includes the actions of mitigating and resolving conflicts in society. Sulh is a form of peacekeeping mechanism laid down by the shariah, and in the Quran, Sulh is regarded as a form of conciliation and “the best form of settlement”. Traditionally, Sulh has been employed as a dispute resolution method in societies, from marital dispute to contractual disagreement. While many confined the spectrum on Sulh only in the area of dispute resolution, research on how Sulh could be employed as a dispute avoidance procedure is yet to be found, although, essentially it has been practiced as such by the Prophet and his companions. With regard to the construction industry, the dispute has caused multi-billion Ringgit of losses. While there are acceptable methods to avoid dispute from conventional perspective in the industry, dispute avoidance from the perspective of shariah has not been addressed. This paper aims to examine how Sulh could be employed as a procedure to avoid dispute. This study adopts qualitative methods where the secondary data are collected from books, journals, reports and statutes to review the practices of dispute avoidance in the construction industry, as well as in shariah. Moving on, the content analysis is adopted to analyse on how Sulh fits in the construction industry as a dispute avoidance practice by comparing the key criteria with the conventional dispute avoidance mechanisms. The finding shows that Sulh shares many similarities with the conventional dispute avoidance; thus, supporting the notion that dispute avoidance is not absolutely absent in shariah, which provides for a possibility to be applied in the construction industry.
References
Abdal-Haqq, I. (2006). Islamic Law: An Overview of Its Origin and Elements. In H. M. Ramadan (Ed.), Understanding Islamic Law: From Classical to Contemporary. AltaMira Press.
Abdul Hak, N., Ahmad, S., & Oseni, U. A. (2013). Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Islam. IIUM Press.
Abdul Hak, N., & Khan, H. (2013, August). The Application of Sulh in Resolving Community Disputes. In Paper presentation at the 1st World Congress on Integration and Islamicisation of Acquired Human Knowledge (FWCII-2013), Prince Hotel & Residence, Kuala Lumpur.
Abu-Nimer, M. (1996). Conflict Resolution In An Islamic Context: Some Conceptual Questions. Peace & Change, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0130.1996.tb00253.x
Abu Dawud, S. A. (2008). Sunan Abu Dawud (Y. Qadhi (ed.)).
Ahmad, S. (2015). Sulh: An Alternative Dispute Resolution and Amicable Settlement Of Family Dispute. UMRAN Journal of Muslim Affairs, 1(1).
Akulenka, I. (2013). The Users’ Perceptions on the Impartiality of the Engineer under the FIDIC Red Book in the UAE. The British University in Dubai.
Al-Mubarakpuri, S.-R. (2014). The Sealed Nectar: Biography of the Noble Prophet (Kindle Ed.). Darussalam Publishers.
Al-Sa’di, A.-R. N. (2018). Tafseer Al-Sa’di (N. Al-Khattab & H. Khattab (eds.); English Ed). International Islamic Publishing House.
Aman, N. S. N., Mohamed, A. M., & Manaf, H. A. (2019). Penghulu Institution Credibility and Leadership: Critical Challenges in Administrative Reform. Journal of Governance and Development, 15(2).
Amaral, J. (2015). Pre-Emptive Or Preventive Mediation? High Level Mediation In The Widened Preventive Diplomacy Agenda. In S. Buckley-Zistel, U. Wagner, & J. M. Becker (Eds.), CCS Working Papers.
Arifin, M. A. (2016). Development of a Proposed Framework for Tahkim in the Malaysian Construction Industry. International Islamic University Malaysia.
Arifin, M. A. (2017). Function Of Shariah In Mitigating Disputes In The Construction Industry Through Muhtasib. Journal of Quantity Surveying & Construction Business, 7(2), 59–81.
Arifin, M. A., Rashid, K. A., Ahmad Sarkawi, A., Hasan, S. F., Fauzi, P. N. F. N. M., & Aripin, S. (2016). Assessing the prospect of using Tahkim as a Shariah‐compliant ADR for resolving construction disputes. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 3(4), 91–94.
Arifin, M. A., Rashid, K. A., Sarkawi, A. A., & Hasan, S. F. (2015). Proposed Framework for Tahkim in the Construction Industry. Advanced Science Letters, 21(6), 1999–2002.
Baalbaki, R. (2009). Al-Mawrid Dictionary Arabic-English. Dar El Ilm Lilmalayin.
Bell, A. (2018). NEC4: New Dispute Resolution and Dispute Avoidance Provisions. Construction Law International, 13(1), 11–14.
Bercovitch, J. (1996). Understanding Mediation’s Role in Preventive Diplomacy. Negotiation Journal, 12(3), 241–258.
Bunni, N. G. (2005). The FIDIC Forms of Contract. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Caldwell, P., & Dettman, K. (2011). Hong Kong Dispute Resolution Advisor: An Alternative to Conventional Dispute Review Boards? DRBF Forum, 15(4), 1–9.
Chapman, P. H. J. (1999). Dispute Boards. FIDIC. https://fidic.org/sites/default/files/25 Dispute Boards.pdf.
Chapman, P. H. J. (2009). Dispute boards on major infrastructure projects. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, 162(1).
Chern, C. (2014). International Commercial Mediation (2nd ed.). Informa Law from Routledge.
Cheung, S. O., & Yiu, T. W. (2006). Are Construction Disputes Inevitable? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(3), 456–470.
CIDB. (2018). CIDB Construction Law Report 2017.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2021). Statistik Pembinaan Suku Tahunan 2021: Suku Kedua.
Dorgan, C. S. (2005). The ICC’s New Dispute Board Rules. The International Construction Law Review, 22(2), 143–150.
Dusuki, A. W. (2009). Challenges of Realizing Maqasid al- Shariah (Objectives of Shariah) in Islamic Capital Market: Special Focus on Equity Based Sukuk (Keynote Address). 3rd USM-ISDEV International Islamic Management Conference on Islamic Capital Market.
Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shari`ah, Maslahah, and Corporate Social Responsibility. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 24(1), 25–45.
Eggleston, B. (2019). The NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract: A Commentar (Third Edit). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Fauzi, P. N. F. N. M., Rashid, K. A., Sarkawi, A. A., Hasan, S. F., Aripin, S., & Arifin, M. A. (2016). Takaful: A review on performance, issues and challenges in Malaysia. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 3(4), 71–76.
Fenn, P., Lowe, D., & Speck, C. (1997). Conflict and dispute in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 15(6), 513–518.
Gidwani, K. (2007). Alternatives to the Dispute Board – Project Mediation. The FIDIC Contracts Conference. https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/ADR 7 - Alternatives to the Dispute Board.pdf
Gould, N. (2006). Establishing Dispute Boards-Selecting, Nominating and Appointing Board Members. A Paper given at the Society of Construction Law International Conference in Singapore, 16th-17th October 2006. http://www.scl.org.uk/papers/establishing-dispute-boards-selecting-nominating-and-appointing-board-members
Habib, S. N. H. A. (2011). Shari’ah Compliance in Construction Procurement with Specific Reference to Contract Formation. International Islamic University Malaysia.
Hassan, R., Khan, H. A., Shaikhli, I. F. A., & Hak, N. A. (2013, March). Setting-up a Sulh-based, community mediation-type of online dispute resolution (ODR) in Malaysia. 2013 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M).
Holt, P. M., Lambton, A. K. S., & Lewis, B. (2000). The Cambridge History of Islam: Volume 1A. Cambridge University Press.
Hoque, M. R., & Mohd Zarif, M. M. (2019). The Paradoxical Use Of The Term Sulh: An Analytical Study From Quranic Perspective. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Quran as Foundation of Civilisation (SWAT 2019).
Hosainy, M. H. (2007). Sulh In Eighteenth-Century Ottoman Fatwa Compilations. Sabancı University.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9).
Ilter, D., Irlayici Cakmak, P., Arici Ustuner, Y., & Tas, E. (2016). Toward a research roadmap for construction mediation. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 8(2).
Koch, C. (2005). The New Dispute Board Rules of the ICC. 23 ASA Bulletin, 1.
Laldin, M. A. (2006). Introduction to Shariah and Islamic Jurisprudence. Cert Publications Sdn Bhd.
Mohd Danuri, M. S., Mohd Ishan, Z., Mustaffa, N. E., Abd-Karim, S. B., Mohamed, O., & Hanid, M. (2016). Dispute avoidance procedure: Formulating a workable legal system in the Malaysian construction industry. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 16(1), 37–46.
Mohd Danuri, M. S., Shaik Mohd Hussain, S. M. N. ., Mustaffa, N. E., & Jaafar, M. S. (2010). Growth of Dispute Avoidance Procedure in the Construction Industry: a Revisit and New Perspectives. Construction Law Journal, 26(5), 349–363.
Moldavska, A., & Welo, T. (2017). The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: A content-analysis based literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166.
Prasow, P. (1950). Preventive Mediation: A Technique to Improve Industrial Relations. Labor Law Journal.
PWD Form 203A (Rev. 1/2010), 59 (2010).
Rashid, K. A. (2009a). Shari’ah Compliant Contract: A New Paradigm in Multi-National Joint Venture for Construction Works. In K. A. Rashid, K. Kobayashi, G. Ofori, & S. Ogunlana (Eds.), Joint Ventures in Construction (pp. 103–114).
Rashid, K. A. (2009b). Shari’ah Compliant Contract: A New Paradigm in Multi-National Joint Venture for Construction Works. In K. Kobayashi, K. Abdul Rashid, G. Ofori, & S. Ogunlana (Eds.), Joint Ventures in Construction (pp. 101–114). Thomas Telford Publishing.
Rashid, S. K. (2006). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Malaysia. Kuliyyah of Laws International Islamic University Malaysia.
Richbell, D. (2008). Mediation of Construction Disputes (1st ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Seppala, C. R. (2001). FIDIC’s New Standard Forms of Contract: Claims, Resolution of Disputes and the Dispute Adjudication Board. International Business Law Journal, 3.
Tamdoğan, I. (2008). Sulh and the 18th Century Ottoman Courts of Üsküdar and Adana. Islamic Law and Society, 15(1).
Thani, N. N., Abdullah, M. R., & Hassan, M. H. (2015). Law And Practice Of Islamic Banking And Finance. Thomson Reuters Asia Sdn. Bhd.
Trumbull, C. P. (2006). Islamic Arbitration: A New Path for Interpreting Islamic Legal Contracts. Vanderbilt Law Review, 59(2), 610–647.
Wahed, H. (2015). SULH: Its Application in Malaysia. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 20(6 Ver. II), 71–79.
Wall, C. J., & Fellows, R. (2010). The dispute resolution adviser (DRA) system in Hong Kong. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, 163(4).
Weiss, B. G. (2006). The Spirit of Islamic Law. The University of Georgia Press.
Zain, N. R. B. M., Ahmadi, F., & Sautunnida, L. (2019). Faith-Based Mediation: A Comparative Perspective On The Application Of Sulh And Ho’oponopono. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 7(1).
GJAT provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
