The Development of Islamic Studies: A Proposed Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT122019-4Keywords:
Islamic studies, Assimilation, Islamization, TraditionAbstract
This article is aimed at elaborating the challenge of Islamic studies in the universities of contemporary Muslim worlds and its proposed solution. This delves at the outset the Muslim intellectual tradition in the past where Muslim established their own discipline of knowledge and subsequently assimilated some concepts and theories from other civilizations. However, unlike Muslim intellectual in the past, the contemporary Muslims intellectual adopted different concepts, theories and approaches in the field of Islamic studies and modern sciences from foreign civilization without prior process of assimilation. As a result, Muslim minds are confused whether they have to employ foreign concepts and theories or hold the concepts and theories from Islamic intellectual tradition. In this predicament the researcher proposed two steps: first is that Muslims intellectual in the Islamic universities should develop Islamic studies in response to the contemporary challenge by re-conceptualizing key concepts of various field of Islamic studies. Second, Muslim intellectual should work on the process of assimilation or Islamization of modern sciences by criticizing, selecting, adapting, remolding and refining foreign concepts incompatible with Islam to form Muslim own discipline of knowledge.
References
Abu Sulayman, A. H. (1989). Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan. International Institute of Islamic Thought. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Q2FLAAAAYAAJ
Acikgence, Alparslan. (1996). The Framework for a History of Islamic Philosophy. Al-Shajarah, Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, (ISTAC), 1(1 & 2), 6.
Al-Attas, M. N. (1978). Islam and Secularism. Suhail Academy. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=axRUAQAACAAJ
Al-Attas, M. N. (1991). The Concept of Education in Islam: A Framework for an Islamic Philosophy of Education. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=hfxwnQAACAAJ
Al-Ghazālī. (1999). Ihyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Daud, M. N. W. (1998). The Educational Philosophy and Practice of Syed Muhammad Naguib Al-Attas: An Exposition of the Original Concept of Islamization. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=0nM2PwAACAAJ
Eliade, M. (1987). The encyclopedia of religion. New York; London: Macmillan ; Collier Macmillan.
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2008). Research methods in the social sciences. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Ghazzali, & Smith, M. (2010). The message from on high : being a translation of Al-Risalah al-Laduniyyah. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.
Kant, I. (2018). Immanuel Kant’s Critique of pure reason. Copenhagen: Cosmopolitan.Locke, J. (n.d.). An essay concerning human understanding. London: George Routledge and Sons.
Nasr, S. H. (1981). Islamic life and thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.Program of Graduate Studies. (1993). Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
Rahman, F. (2011). Islamization of Knowledge: A Response. Islamicstudies Islamic Studies, 50(3–4), 449–457.
Rajab, I. A. (1996). Towards a new paradigm for social science research. In Fourth International Social Science Methodology Conference. Colchester: University of Essex.
Safi, L. M. (1996). The foundation of Knowledge : a comparative study in Islamic and western methods of inquiry. Kuala Lumpur: Research Centre IIUM.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
Wall, T. F. (2001). Thinking Critically About Philosophical Problems, A Modern Introduction. Australia: Wadsworth: Thomson Learning.
Windschuttle, K. (1999). Edward Said’s orientalism revisited. The New Criterion, 17(5).