Relationship between Workplace Incivility, Job Attitudes and Muslim Religiosity Personality among Trade Union Members
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT892015.05.02Keywords:
Workplace incivility, employment relations, Muslim religiosity personality, trade union, QuantitativeAbstract
In reality, workplace incivility has its fair share of attention in organizational research dealing with its causes and effect relationships. In Islam, incivility equates the negative character (akhlak) of ridiculing others. Consequently, the purpose of this study is to investigate relationship between the experience of workplace incivility and job attitudes as well as the moderating effect of Muslim religiosity personality, which is measured by Muslim Religiosity-Personality Inventory (MRPI), on the relationships. In other words, this study plans to analyze whether Muslim employees, who possess religiosity personality would be able to endure workplace incivility experiences. Basically, literature by Al-Ghazali, Al-Attas and Al-Raiya on Islamic personality serve as the main foundation of the study. In addition, the works of Baron and Neuman (1998), Andersson & Pearson (1999) and Schilpzand, et. al (2014) were reviewed and a research framework was developed. The quantitative survey consisted of five sections used to measure the experience of workplace incivility, job attitudes, religiosity personality and demographics. A sample of 163 Malaysian Muslim bank workers completed the survey. Four main variables have been analyzed and their descriptive analyses are as the following. Scores for Workplace Incivility variable (M=3.34, SD=.27); Job Satisfaction variable (M=1.79, SD=.65); Organizational Commitment variable (M=2.74, SD=.34) and Muslim Religiosity Personality (M=3.60, SD=.42). As for the Pearson’s Correlation test,the result indicates that Workplace Incivility variable has inverse correlations with both job attitude variables (Job Satisfaction, R=-.611, p=.01; Organizational Commitment, R=.731,p=.01). Meanwhile, the overall model
was significant, R2 = .401, F(3, 159) = 24.06, p = .01. Tests to see if the data met the assumption of collinearity indicate that multicollinearity was not a concern (Job Satisfaction, Tolerance = .96, VIF = 1.01; Organizational Commitment, Tolerance = .72, VIF = 1.39, Muslim Religiosity Personality, Tolerance =.72, VIF =1.39). Conclusively, the results of this study demonstrate a negative relationship between the experience of workplace incivility and the job attitude variables. Furthermore, this study shows the moderating effect of an individual religiosity personality trait on the relationship
between the experience of workplace incivility and the job attitudes. Consequently, implications of the research include further contribution to workplace incivility theoretical aspects, Muslim religiosity personality research, managerial decision making and employer - union interventions for workplace incivility.
References
Al-Al Quran
Abdullah, Y. A. (2007). The Holy Al Quran, Text and Translation. Islamic Book Trust, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Abu-Raiya, H. (2012). Toward a systematic Qura’nic theory of personality. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(3), 217–233.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (2001). Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).
Al-Ghazali, M. (1995). The revival of religious sciences, 3rd part. Dar al-Fikr, Beirut.
Annalakshmi, N., & Abeer, M. (2011).Islamic worldview, religious personality and resilience among Muslim adolescent students in India. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7(4):716-738.
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 452-471.
Ansari, Z. (2002). Islamic psychology. In R. P. Olsen (Ed.), Religious theories of personality and psychotherapy: East meets West (pp. 325–357). Haworth Press, New York, USA.
Barron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1998). Workplace aggression-The iceberg beneath the tip of workplace violence: Evidence on its forms, frequency, and targets. Public Administration Quarterly, 21(4):446-464.
Epps, S. R., Park, S. E., Huston, A. C, & Ripke, M. (2003). Psychometric Analyses of the Positive Behavior Scale in the New Hope Project and the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Paper presented at the Indicators of Positive Development Conference, March 12-13, 2003, Washington, DC, USA.
Hafiz, M. Z. & Hafiz H. A. (2014) Islamic Sharia Teachings and Practices for Preventing Bullying. American International Journal of Contemporary. 4 (1):254-265.
Haque, A. (2004). Psychology from Islamic perspective: Contributions of early Muslim scholars and challenges to contemporary Muslim psychologists. Journal of Religion and Health, 43, 357–377
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656-669.
Krauss, S. E., & Hamzah, A.(2009). The Muslim Religiosity-Personality Inventory (MRPI). University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.
Krauss, S. E., Azimi, H. H., Turiman, S., Sidek, M.N., Rumaya, J., Jamiah, H. M., Khairul, A.M., Hasnan, K., & Azma, M. (2006) Exploring Regional Differences in Religiosity Among Muslim Youth in Malaysia. Review of Religious Research, 47(3):238-252.
Laschinger, H., Leiter, M., Day A, Gilin, D., (2009). Workplace empowerment, incivility, and burnout: Impact on staff nurse recruitment and retention outcomes. Journal of Nursing Management. 17,302-11.
Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M.,(2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology. 90, 483-96.
Martin, R. J., & Hine, D. W. (2005) Development and validation of the uncivil workplace behavior questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(4), 477-490.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603– 609.
Shim, J. H. (2010) The relationship between workplace incivility and the intention to share knowledge; the mediating effect of a collaborative climate and the moderating effect of individual characteristics (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
Schilpzand, P., Erez, A., & Pater, I. E. D. (2014). Workplace Incivility: A Review of the literature and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Seashore, S. E., Lawler, E. E., III, Mirvis, P. H., & Cammann, C. (1983). Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
Sliter, M.T., Jex, S.M., Wolford, K.A., & McInnerney, J. (2010). How rude! Emotional labor as a mediator between customer incivility and employee outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 15, 468-81.
Sliter, M. T., Sliter, K. A., & Jex, S. M. (2012). The employee as a punching bag: The effect of multiple sources of incivility on employee withdrawal behavior and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 33, 121-39.
Yasien, M. (1996). Fitra: The Islamic concept of human nature. Ta-Ha Publisher, London.
GJAT provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
