English Language Competency among Malaysian Children: A Socialisation Process

Authors

  • Yamat, Hamidah Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI052019-3

Keywords:

Socialisation, English language compentency, Second language acquisition, Ethnographic, Malaysian children

Abstract

In many countries, the practice of teaching a second language is treated like teaching a subject matter that needs to be mastered; that there is a syllabus to be completed without fail and is tested for grammar accuracy. However, language is social and therefore language learning should be interpreted as a socialisation process; particularly when it is taught at a young age. This sets the purpose of the study presented and discussed in this paper - to demonstrate that language learning is a socialisation process. Hence, an Ethnographic Case Study approach was employed as it enabled a close exploration of the lived experiences of young children. Three children aged six, their mothers and classroom teacher were purposively as the participants in this study. Data was gathered through interviews and triangulated with classroom and home observations. Themes and codes were developed and analysed through the grounded theory constant comparative data analysis process. Validity and reliability measures included triangulation, memberchecking, rigouressness and trustworthiness in reporting the data. Findings indicate that the children ‘got’ the language at play; through language use as they interacted with others and their environment. This highlighted the socialisation process. It implies that language is a tool of communication which is to be used, not memorised. Hence, it should not be taught as a subject at schools or institutions. Instead, it should be used as the medium of socialisation in the teaching and learning process of subject matters such as History where it involves telling stories or in Sports Education where sports is an internationally shared interest.

References

Atkinson, D. (2002). Towards a Sociocognitive Approach to Second Language Acquisition. Modern Language Journal; 86(4): 526-545.

Breen, M.P. (2001). Learner contributions to language learning. England: Pearson Education

Brooker, L. (2001). Interviewing children. In. MacNaughton, G., Rolfe, S. and SirajBlatchford, I. (2001). Doing early childhood research: International perspectives on theory and practice, 162-177.

Cummins, J. (2008). B. Street and N. H. Hornberger (eds) BICS and CALP: Empirical And Theoretical Status Of The Distinction. Encyclopedia of Language and Education,2nd Edition, Volume 2: Literacy, 71–83. Springer Science & Business Media LLC.

Ellis, R. (1999). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition; 22, 471-497.

Everett D. L. (2012). Language: The Cultural Tool. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaun Associates, Publishers.

Gee, J.P. (2014). The Social Mind: Language, Ideology, and Social Practice. Common Ground Publishing Pty.

Greene, S. (2000). Research Methods in Health, Social and Early Years Care. UK: Stanley Thomas Pub. Ltd.

Hamidah Yamat. (2010). Young Malaysian Children’s Second Language Experience in The United Kingdom. PhD Dissertation.online http://ethos.bl.uk/

Hazita Azman. (2009). English in 1Malaysia: A Paradox in Rural Pluri-Literacy Practices. Akademika, 76 (Mei-Ogos): 27 - 41.

Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi. (2012). The National Graduate Employability Blueprint 2012- 2017. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.

Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and practice in SLA. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Lantolf, J.P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79 – 96.

Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.

Noor Saazai, S., Hamidah, Y., Harison@Hanisa, M.S., Hazleena, B. & Muzhafar, M.I. (2016). Acts Of Agency In English Language Learning Experience. International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences; 2(6): 733-745. Online http://ijasos.ocerintjournals.org. Retrieved on 21st January 2017.

Pennycook, A. (1994). The Cultural Politics of English As An International Language. Michigan: Longman.

Radnor, H. (2002). Researching your professional practice: Doing interpretive research. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. London: SAGE Pub.

Weitzman, R. S. (2013). A Review of Language: The Cultural Tool by Daniel L.Everett. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 185–198

Zuengler, J. and Miller, E. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 35 – 58

Downloads

Published

04-09-2024

How to Cite

Yamat, Hamidah. (2024). English Language Competency among Malaysian Children: A Socialisation Process. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 9(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI052019-3

Issue

Section

Articles