Needs Analysis Review: Constructs of Integrated Principal Leadership Model and Counselling Approach

Authors

  • Mohd Shahid bin Ahmad  School of Applied Psychology, Social Work and Policy, Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Rosliza Ahmad School of Applied Psychology, Social Work and Policy, Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Fatimah Zailly Ahmad Ramli School of Applied Psychology, Social Work and Policy, Universiti Utara Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT072023-5

Keywords:

Needs Analysis, M-KIPK model, Design and Development Research (DDR), Principal Leadership, Counselling in Leadership

Abstract

The needs analysis study was carried out to investigate the issues related to principal leadership and counselling that led to the need for constructing the Integrated Principal Leadership Model and Counselling Approach (M-KIPK) which was developed using the design and development research (DDR). This study was carried out qualitatively and quantitatively. In the needs analysis phase, data collection was conducted through questionnaires distributed to 282 participants from eight (8) MRSMs in Perak. Descriptive statistics namely frequency and percentage were used to analyse the data while the qualitative study involved interviews of 13 participants who have had experience in leadership and counselling. The findings showed that the participants’ confidence on the need for counselling approach in principal leadership practice and that counselling knowledge would improve the administrative quality of principals was high with mean values of 4.46 or 97.90% and 4.52 or 98.50% respectively. In conclusion, the construction of the M-KIPK Model is necessary in the management of the principal leadership in the school with the inclusion of the counselling constructs. Therefore, the implementation of the M-KIPK Model will assist principals in improving their leadership qualities.

References

Norlidah Alias, & Saedah Siraj. (2012, October). Design and Development of Physics Module Based on Learning Style and Appropriate Tcehnology by Employing Isman Instructional Design Model. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4).

Norlidah Alias. (2010). Pembangunan modul pedagogi berasaskan teknologi dan gaya pembelajaran Felder Silverman kurikulum fizik sekolah menengah. Tesis PhD, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.

Reinbold, S. (2013). Using the ADDIE model in designing library instruction. Medical Reference Services Quarterly,32(3) ,244 – 256.

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and developmental research. New York, NY: Routledge Witkin, B.R (1997).Needs assessment kits, models,and tools. Educational Technology, 17(11),5-8

Mohd Paris Saleh, & Saedah Siraj. (2016). Analisis Keperluan Pembangunan Model Pengajaran M-Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 4(4), 12–24.

Wango, G. M. (2014). Counselling Psychology in Kenya: A Contemporary Review of the Developing World. Nairobi: Kenya Literature Bureau.

Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. (2012). Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur.

Ding, J., Kuo, J., & Tai, W. (2019). A Fuzzy evaluation model of choosing a middle manager for an international shipping service provider, Brodogradnja 70(1), 93–107.

Roselena Mansor & Mohd Izham (2015) Mohd Hamzah Kepimpinan Berkualiti: Perspektif mengenai Kompetensi yang Diperlukan untuk Memimpin dengan Berkesan. Jurnal Pengurusan, 45, 143 – 154.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan (PIPP). Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia .

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2018). Laporan Tahunan 2017 Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Shafinaz A. Maulod, (2017) Hubungan antara kecerdasan emosi dan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru sekolah menengah kebangsaan di Negeri Sembilan. PhD thesis, University of Malaya.

Norazlinda Saad & Surendran Sankaran (2016). Galakan Pengetua Dalam Membuat Keputusan Dengan Komitmen Guru Di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Berpencapaian Rendah. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan. Universiti Malaya.

Fassinger, R. E., & Good, G. E. (2017). Academic leadership and counseling psychology: Answering the challenge, achieving the promise. The Counseling Psychologist, 45, 752–780.

Kelly, Louise & Finkelman, Jay. (2011). The Psychologist Manager: Uniquely Qualified to Address 21st-Century Leadership Challenges?. The Psychologist-manager Journal. 14.

Ching Mei See & Kok-Mun Ng. (2010). Counseling in Malaysia: History, current status and future trends. Journal In Counseling Development, 88, 18- 22

Suradi Salim. (2005). Hala tuju penyelidikan kaunseling di Malaysia. Jurnal PERKAMA. 11:1-14. Abdul Karim Llin, 1998; Azmi Abd. Rahman, 2005; Gambang, 2005; Haslee; Siti

Manchelah A/P Natesan. (2017). Keberkesanan Perkhidmatan Bimbingan Dan Kaunseling Sekolah Menengah di Malaysia. PhD thesis, University of Malaya.

Wan Azizah Wan Ismail (2019). Perutusan Majlis Pelancaran Sambutan Bulan Kaunseling Kebangsan 2019. Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga Dan Masyarakat, Kuala Lumpur.

Shahril @ Charil Marzuki. (2001). Ciri-ciri Kepimpinan Pengetua/Guru Besar Yang Dapat Menghadapi Cabaran dan Harapan Pada Abad ke 21 Ini. Jurnal Institut Pengetua Universiti Malaya, 1(1), 7–17.

Muhyiddin Yassin (2012). Sudut Pandang Muhyiddin Yassin. Institut Terjemahan & Buku Malaysia.

Dorothy, D., Norlidah, A., & Saedah, S. (2013). Merekabentuk interaksi bagi pembelajaran dalam talian: Pedagogi modul CmL. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 19-27.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Catherine, C. (2015). Conducting Research Interviews for Business and Managements Students. Sage Publication. London.

Cohen, J. A. (2008). Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.

McEwan, E. K. (1998). The principal’s guide to raising reading achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of educational research, 87(1), 134-171.

Abd Majid, Faizah & Majid, (2016). Kajian Tindakan dan Pembangunan Profesional Guru-guru di Malaysia: Cabaran dan strategi, Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan 2016 Fakulti & Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: CBS Publishing.

Mohd Yusri Ibrahim. (2010). Bimbingan cepat analisis data penyelidikan untuk pendidikan dan sains sosial. Kuantan, Pahang: Bandar Ilmu.

Downloads

Published

05-07-2024

How to Cite

Mohd Shahid bin Ahmad , Rosliza Ahmad, & Fatimah Zailly Ahmad Ramli. (2024). Needs Analysis Review: Constructs of Integrated Principal Leadership Model and Counselling Approach. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 13(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT072023-5