The Grammar of Persuasion: An Analysis of The Rumiyah of ISIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT072020-1Keywords:
ISIS, Hallidayan SFL, Language Mood, Grammar of Persuasion, RumiyahAbstract
ISIS is known for its influential propaganda activities, which includes their online publication (e.g. the Rumiyah magazine). Their language of propaganda has proven to be very effective in recruiting foreign fighters from many countries. It therefore makes it worth analyzing it. This research examines the grammar of ISIS's language of persuasion, more specifically, the mood types of the clauses, their speech-function realization, and the SFL patterns of persuasion. A discourse analysis on the clauses of an article (text) in the Rumiyah, entitled, 'Just Terror Tactics', was applied. The Hallidayan SFL theory was used as the basis of analysis. The result shows that the writer mainly applied declarative moods functioning as indirect directives and presented them as suggestions to soften their instructions to do knife terror. In terms of clause patterns, the writer applied four typical patterns to make suggestions, four typical patterns to make trivialization, and four typical patterns to make amplification.
References
Al-Ameedi, R. T. (2015). A Pragmatic Study of Barak Obama's Political Propaganda Journal of Education and Practice, 6(20), 75-86.
Archick, K., Belkin, P., Blanchard, C. M., Humud, C. E., & Mix, D. E. (2015). European Fighters in Syria and Iraq: Assessments, Responses, and Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Ayoola, M. O. (2013). An Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of Some Selected Political Advertisements in Some Nigerian Newspapers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(8), 165-178.
Azman, N. A. (2016). Islamic State (IS) Propaganda: Dabiq and Future Directions of 'Islamic State'. RSIS (S.Rajaratham School of International Studies), 8(10), 3-8.
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Coffin, C. (2004). Arguing about how the world is or how the world should be: The role of argument in IELTS Test Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3), 229-246.
Dillard, J. P., & Pfau, M. (2002). The Persuasion. Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dooley, R. (2013, April 22). https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerdooley/2013. Retrieved 8 10, 2019, from https://www.forbes.com:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerdooley/2013/ 04/22/the-easy-path-to-persuasion/#75a095b633
a
Eggins, S (2004) Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York: Continuum.
Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (2010) Persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (4th ed) Boston Allyn & Bacon.
Georges, A. (2015). ISIS Rhetoric for the Creation of the Ummah. Abu Dhabi: TRENDS Research & Advisory.
Halliday, M. (2014). Introduction to Functional Grammar, New York: Routledge.
Held, G. (2005) Politeness in linguistic research. In S. 1. Richard J. Watts, Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice (pp. 131-153) Berlin Mouton de Gruyter.
Hogan, K., & Speakman, J. (2006) Covert Persuasion, Psychological Tactics and Tricks to Win the Game New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jalali, M. S. (2014). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Speech of Four Candidates of Rasht City Council Elections in 2013, with a view to Fairclough Approach. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 1(2) 8-18.
Kellermann, K., & Cole, T. (1994). Classifying compliance gaining messages Taxonomic disorder and strategic Communication Theory, 4(1), 3-60.
confusion.
Khalih, F. M., & Tayeh, A. (2013) Indirectness in English requests among Malay university. students. Procedia, 134/2014), 44-52.
Kondowe W (2014). Interpersonal Metafunctions in Bingu wa Mutharika's Second-Term Political Discourse: A Systemic Functional Grammatical Approach International Journal of Linguistics, 6(3), 70-84.
Lillian, D. L. (2008). Modality, Persuasion and Manipulation in Canadian Conservative Discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines (CADAAD), 2(1), 1-16.
Lirola, M. M. (2016) Multimodal analysis of a sample of political posters in Ireland during and after the Celtic Tiger Revista Signos
Estudios de linguistica, 49(91), 245-267
Lyons, (1977) Semantics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milkovich, M. (2017) Epistemic Modality in Political Discourse. Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities, 3(1), 75-79.
Mulholland, J. (1994). Handbook of persuasive tactics. A practical language guide London and New York: Routledge.
Newell, G., Beach, R., & Smith, J. &. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273-304.
Palmer, F. R. (2001) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Power, M. R. (1998). Chapter 2 Persuasion. structure and language devices. In M. R. Power, Working Through Communication (pp. 22-30) Gold Coast: Bond University.
Simons, H. W., & Jones, J. G. (2017). Persuasion in Society (3rd ed.) New York: Routledge.
Simons, H. W., Morreale, J. & Gronbeck, B (2001) Persuasion in Society Thousand Oaks London New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc..
Straker, D. (2002, 11) http://changingmands.org/principles. Retrieved August 2, 2019, from http://changingminds.org/principles/principles.h http://changingminds.org/principles/principles.htm
Vergani, M., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2015) The evolution of the ISIS' language a quantitative analysis of the language of the first year of Dabiq magazine Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Società, 2, 7-20.
Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Westmaas, R. (2017 August 22) https://curiosity.com/topics/. Retrieved August 2. 2019 from https://curiosity.com
https://curiosity.com/topics/use-amplification-to -persuade-people-without-them-realizing-u-curiosity/