Motives Behind Active Facebook, Instagram and Other Social Media Users

Authors

  • Nabsiah Abdul Wahid Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, 11800 Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Zebedeus Henry Bakim Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, 11800 Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Shaizatulaqma Kamalul Ariffin Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, 11800 Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI022022-8

Keywords:

Consumer Behaviour, Uses and Gratification Theory, Motive, Social Media

Abstract

Social media (SM) is ‘the’ place individuals use to socialize, connect and share up-to-date information with other parties. According to The Uses and Gratification theory (U&GT), individuals have needs to satisfy to feel gratified; they use SM to satisfy these personal needs to achieve self-gratification. Gratifications differ for individuals depending on their background and types of SM medium used. Question is, what are the motives behind SM user’s activeness behaviour in their medium of choice in Malaysia’s scenario? Seven common motives, namely, watching, impressing, acting, surveillance, documentation, coolness and creativity were hypothesized to have significant influences over SM users’ activeness behaviour. The study disseminated online surveys to targeted and willing active SM users in the research; it resulted in 397 useable data for analysis. Overall, the study managed to identify four motives, namely, watching, impressing, documentation and coolness as the drivers behind activeness behaviour of SM users in Malaysia. The study also identifies FB as the most popular SM, followed by IG. Further segmentation analysis on each FB-active (n=125), IG-active (n=100) and other SM-active (n=82) found that the main motive for FB users was to impress (impressing) others; for IG users, the main reason was to watch others (watching). As for other SM-active, three motives emerged, i.e. watching, surveillance and documentation. The findings imply the usefulness of U&GT in explaining individual’s motives for being active SM user as well as importance of motives behind activeness of SM user’s behaviour for different types of SMs.

References

Al-Menayes, J. J. (2015). Social Media Use, Engagement and Addiction as Predictors of Academic Performance. International Journal of Psychological Studies 7(4), 86. doi: 10.5539/ijps.v7n4p86

Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130

Hair J. J., Hult G. T., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). London: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Herzog, H. (1944). What do we really know about day-time serial listeners? In P. Lazarsfeld & F. Stanton (Eds.), Radio research, 1942-1943. New York: Duel, Sloan and Pearce

Kalla S. (2016). Statistical Power Analysis - Determine the sample size. (online) Explorable.com. Available at: https://explorable.com/statistical-power-analysis. (Accessed 20 Oct 2019).

Kapidzic, S. (2013). Narcissism as a predictor of motivations behind Facebook profile picture selection. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 14-19. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1089/cyber.2012.0143.

Katz, E., & Foulkes, D. (1962). On the Use of the Mass Media as “Escape”: Clarification of a Concept. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377-388.

Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268109

Ku, Y. C., Chu, T. H., & Tseng, C. H. (2013). Gratifications for using CMC technologies: A comparison among SNS, IM, and e-mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 226-234.

Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311-321.

Lee, E., Lee, J. A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 552–556.

Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (2018). Internet Users Survey 2018: Statistical Brief Number Twenty-Three. https://www.mcmc.gov.my/skmmgovmy/ media/General/pdf/Internet-Users-Survey-2018.pdf accessed 11 May 2020.

Mull, I. R., & Lee, S. (2014). “PIN” pointing the motivational dimensions behind Pinterest. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 192-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01. 011.

Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249.

Ozimek, P., Baer, F., and Förster, J. (2017). Materialists on Facebook: the self-regulatory role of social comparisons and the objectification of Facebook friends. Heliyon, 3. e00449. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017. e00449

Ozimek, P., & Bierhoff, H. W. (2016). Facebook use depending on age: The influence of social comparisons, Computers in Human Behavior 61, 271-279, doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016. 03.034

Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2

Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behaviour, 62, 155-167.

Piwek, L., & Joinson, A. (2016). “What do they snapchat about?” Patterns of use in time- limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 358–367.

Richardson, J. (2003). Uses and gratifications of agnostic refuge: Case study of a skeptical online congregation. Journal of Media and Religion, 2, 237-250.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business - A skill building approach (7th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89–97.

Throuvala, M. A., Griffiths, M. D., Rennoldson, M., & Kuss D. J. (2019). Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: A qualitative focus group study. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 64-175.

Tomko, C. (2007). Growing up internet: a qualitative case study of a long-term relationship of a teenage girl mentored by a middle-agaed woman in the on-line world; Master of Fine and Applied Arts Thesis, The University of Akron. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd. send_file?accession=akron1195154423&disposition=inline

Whiting, A. & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041

Wu, J. H., Wang, S. C., & Tsai, H. H. (2010). Falling in love with online games: The uses and gratifications perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1862-1871.

Downloads

Published

22-07-2024

How to Cite

Nabsiah Abdul Wahid, Zebedeus Henry Bakim, & Shaizatulaqma Kamalul Ariffin. (2024). Motives Behind Active Facebook, Instagram and Other Social Media Users. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI022022-8