Model Pemerian Ciri-Ciri Akustik Bunyi Plosif Dan Frikatif Arab Yang Diujarkan Oleh Penutur Natif Melayu

Modelling of Arabic Plosive and Fricative Acoustic Characteristics Articulated by Malay Native Speakers

Authors

  • Majdan Paharal Radzi Pusat Pengajian Bahasa Arab, Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Shahidi A. Hamid Pusat Kajian Bahasa, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT122022-7

Keywords:

Impressionistic, Acoustic Phonetics, Voicing Lead, Voicing Lag, Voice Onset Time

Abstract

This study aims to examine the pharyngealized and non-pharyngealized Arabic sounds produced by Malay speakers based on acoustic phonetic approach and to investigate its relation with the second language learning model proposed by Flege (1995). The plosive and fricative associated with the pharyngealized and non-pharyngealized of Arabic sounds is one of the main problems among non-Arabic native speakers in learning Arabic language. Recent studies emphasize the influence of the first language / mother tongue language as the cause of the failure to master the Arabic language as the second language. Hence the frameworks of the similar, different and new sound hypotheses proposed by Flege (1995) were used to get the real picture of the Arabic language speech phenomenon in the second language condition. PRAAT software was used to obtain speech data in the spectrogram and to undergo spectrograph analysis. Subsequently, the findings were analyzed using SPSS to highlight the overall results of the study more thoroughly. VOT (Voice Onset Time) acoustic parameters for the plosive sound and frication of the frication sounds were used during the spectrograph analysis. A total of 2880 spectrogram data were obtained from the subjects: 24 undergraduates from the Bachelor of Islamic Studies with Honors (Arabic Studies and Islamic Civilization) UKM. The results of the production experiment show that Malay plosive sound has negative VOT for voiced stop and short positive VOT for voiceless stop, while Arabic plosive sounds has a model pattern voicing lead versus long lag for voiced and voiceless stops respectively.  The results show that Arabic voiceless stop / ت / is aspirated and found to has a longer VOT than Malay voiceless stop /t/. For Arabic pharyngealized sounds, the results show higher values of F1 than non-pharyngealized sounds. In addition, Arabic pharyngealized sounds are found to have shorter VOT than non-pharyngealized Arabic sounds. The findings showed that there were cases where subjects managed to replicate the L2 sound to similar sound of L1 and there were cases of L2 sounds that are foreign to the sound system of L1. With that in mind, it can be emphasized that some studies have supported Flege’s theory that the similar sound between L1 and L2 are not necessarily easy to pronounce, while there are L2 phonemes that are absent in L1, but they are easily learnt by the L2 speaker.

References

Al-Misreb, Ali Abd., Ahmad Farid Abidin & Nooritawati Mad Tahir. An acoustic investigation of Arabic vowels pronounced by Malay speakers. Journal of King Saud 28 (2): 148-156.

Badrulzaman Abd. Hamid. 2016. Analisis Kontras Penyuaraan Bunyi Plosif Kanak-Kanak Melayu Berasaskan Pendekatan Fonetik Akustik. Tesis Dr. Fal. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Badrulzaman Abdul Hamid. 1999. VOT (Masa Mula Bersuara) Pada Bunyi Plosif Bahasa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Best, C.T. 1995. A direct realist perspective on cross language speech perception. Dlm. Strange, W. (pnyt.)., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross Language Research, hlm. 171-204. Timonium: York Press.

Boersma, P. & Weenik, D. 2015. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.4.22) [Computer program]. http://www.praat.org/ [11 Jun 2017].

Docherty, G.J. 1992. The Timing of Voicing in British English Obstruents. Berlin & New York: Foris Publications.

Flege, J. 1992. Speech learning in a second language, In Phonological development: models, research, and application. In Ferguson, C., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (Eds.). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Indrawati Zahid. 2003. Kajian Intonasi Fonetik Eksperimental: Realisasi Makna Emosi Filem Sembilu 1 dan 2. Tesis Dr. Fal. Akademi Pengajian Melayu, Universiti Malaya.

Khattab, G., al-Tamimi, F. & Heselwood, B. 2006. Acoustic and auditory differences in the opposition in male and female speakers of Jordanian Arabic. Dlm. Boudela, S. (pnyt.)., Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XIV, hlm. 131-60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Khattab, Ghada. 1999. A socio-phonetic study of English-Arabic bilingual children. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 7: 79–94

Ladefoged, P. 2003. Phonetic Data Analysis: An Introduction to the Sound of Languages. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Lado, R. 1957. Linguistic Across Cultures. Ann Barbor: University of Michigan Press.

Lisker, L. & Abramson, A.S. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20: 384-422.

Majdan Paharal Radzi, Che Radiah Mezah, Nik Farhan Mustapha & Mohammad Azizie Aziz. 2015. Al-Akhta al-Sya’iah fi nutqi ba’da al-aswat al-’arabiyyah lada tullab al-jami’at fi Malizia. Global Journal al-Thaqafah 5(1): 5-10s.

Mohd Zaki Abd. Rahman. 2000. Huruf dalam Bahasa Arab: Nilai dan Kegunaannya. Tesis Dr. Fal. Universiti Malaya.

Muhammad Faiz Abdullah & Kaseh Abu Bakar. 2018. Tekanan perkataan Arab sebagai bahasa asing dalam kalangan penutur Melayu. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 18(1): 87-105.

Nazratul Aini Ramli, Che Radiah Mezah & Yap, Ngee Thai. 2016. Penguasaan pelajar Melayu terhadap tekanan suara menyebut perkataan Arab dari sudut intensiti. Jurnal Kemanusiaan 25(1): 110-123.

Shaharina Mokhtar, Shahidi A.H. & Badrulzaman Abdul Hamid. 2014. Analisis frekuensi asas (F0) bunyi vokal bahasa Melayu: Pencerakinan berdasarkan fonetik akustik. Jurnal Bahasa 14(2): 289-300.

Shaharina Mokhtar. 2013. Penghasilan Bunyi Vokal Dalam Pertuturan Bahasa Melayu oleh Penutur Natif dan Asing: Pencerakinan Berasaskan Pendekatan Fonetik Akustik. Tesis Dr. Fal. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Shahidi A. Hamid, Rahim Aman & Zulkifley Hamid. 2012. Kajian akustik realisasi kontras penyuaraan bunyi plosive bahasa Melayu. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 12(2): 745-760.

Shahidi A. Hamid. 2010. An Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of the Phonetic Properties of Malay English in Comparison to those of Malay. Tesis Dr. Fal. Speech and Language Sciences Section, University of Newcastle.

Shahidi, A.H. & Shirley Langgau. 2014. Penelitian akustik terhadap aspek sebutan bahasa Melayu oleh penutur Iban. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Science and Humanities 9(2): 104-115.

Shirley Langgau. 2014. Pertuturan Bahasa Melayu (Bahasa Kedua) oleh Penutur Iban: Satu Kajian Fonetik Akustik. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Zahariah Pilus. 2002. Second language speech: Production and perception of voicing contrasts in word-final obstruents by Malay speakers of English. Tesis Dr. Fal. University of Wisconsin.

Zawaydeh, B.A. (1999). The phonetics and phonology of gutturals in Arabic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

Zuraidah Md. Don, 1996. Prosody in Malay Discourse: An Analysis of Broadcast Interview. Tesis Dr. Fal. Universiti Malaya.

Downloads

Published

14-07-2024

How to Cite

Majdan Paharal Radzi, & Shahidi A. Hamid. (2024). Model Pemerian Ciri-Ciri Akustik Bunyi Plosif Dan Frikatif Arab Yang Diujarkan Oleh Penutur Natif Melayu: Modelling of Arabic Plosive and Fricative Acoustic Characteristics Articulated by Malay Native Speakers . Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 12(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT122022-7